Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-129183-apmail-commons-dev-archive=commons.apache.org@commons.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 684538848
	for <apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Mon,  5 Sep 2011 15:38:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 978 invoked by uid 500); 5 Sep 2011 15:38:23 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org
Received: (qmail 892 invoked by uid 500); 5 Sep 2011 15:38:23 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@commons.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@commons.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.commons.apache.org>
Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" <dev@commons.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org
Received: (qmail 884 invoked by uid 99); 5 Sep 2011 15:38:23 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Sep 2011 15:38:23 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0
	tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of sebbaz@gmail.com designates
 209.85.212.43 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.212.43] (HELO mail-vw0-f43.google.com) (209.85.212.43)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Sep 2011 15:38:17 +0000
Received: by vws10 with SMTP id 10so5445728vws.30
        for <dev@commons.apache.org>; Mon, 05 Sep 2011 08:37:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=M6F6wuVj0uIvfzJUCeUf5t1D1aE4tbIbda7iTbKlfj4=;
        b=aZj8s3xgDwqaWngyiusDUuijChaU/tcOcAX+x2nz2U0oVi6gdYP+D+CA/L1SnNRlz4
         cY8zeOFrp5KnoDrUOvglel6gKooAtIe1jr6NeHj2RhUvUY+szzjrrY16Jm57K9yoIs2N
         rXMrSpOeXs/p6JbDrxZMiitvKF6lYiLDDFFPw=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.5.210 with SMTP id 18mr1199498vcw.83.1315237076363; Mon,
 05 Sep 2011 08:37:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.220.108.129 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 08:37:56 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAF8HOZ+ipyHLGapCmZV8VA1ACO=7R3MNN6yDHAuyhquW8M_enA@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAAqLGLPuEU5kpm1-GTQyU=rEfOcAwxPbW8E+GN2Jcic4zVcojA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAF8HOZ+ipyHLGapCmZV8VA1ACO=7R3MNN6yDHAuyhquW8M_enA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 16:37:56 +0100
Message-ID: 
 <CAOGo0VZLboTg=3Z=ZunuuhgtjdXPGdTmU1fft24kR13pEnaZFg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [CHAIN][VOTE] accept the 2.0-work brach as proper codebase in
 /trunk
From: sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com>
To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

On 5 September 2011 16:33, Jochen Wiedmann <jochen.wiedmann@gmail.com> wrot=
e:
> Housework check:
>
> - =A0Has the package name been changed?
> A- Has thae Maven groupId aand/or artifactId been changed?

I'd strongly recommend leaving these changes until just before release
- it's much easier to run Clirr if the package name has not been
changed.

> DAOes t<he <s
>
> On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 5:13 PM, Simone Tripodi <simonetripodi@apache.org>=
 wrote:
>> Hi all guys,
>> thanks to a user, Elijah Zupancic, that recently submitted CHAIN-53, a
>> group of Commons committers started working on that component in a
>> branch 2.0[1] to experiment updates and study improvements in order to
>> push a next release soon.
>> We are in the middle of discussing about the current/improved design,
>> maintaining - or not - the retro-compatibility, better modularization
>> - splitting the chain in submodules - and so on, so as you maybe
>> noticed latest ML activity looks like there is a renewed interest from
>> both committers and users that came back to submit contributions.
>> You would be maybe interested on see which level of
>> retro-compatibility we maintained after the update, by reading the
>> Clirr report[2] published on my personal ASF space.
>> So we are interested on releasing that code and our proposal is to
>> move the current trunk in a 1.x branch and move the 2.0 work in trunk,
>> please cast your vote:
>>
>> [+1] =A0 =A0let's make the branch the code we want to see released as ne=
w chain
>> [+/- 0] feel free to express opinions
>> [-1] =A0 =A0 because...
>>
>> Feedbacks are, obviously, welcome.
>> Many thanks in advance, all the best!!!
>> Simo
>>
>> [1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/chain/branches/versi=
on-2.0-work
>> [2] http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/chain/clirr-report.html
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>> http://www.99soft.org/
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Capitalism is the astounding belief that the most wickedest of men
> will do the most wickedest of things for the greatest good of
> everyone.
>
> John Maynard Keynes (http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Keynes)
>
> https://linuxcounter.net/user/221257.html
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org