Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 663698E3E for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 16:15:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 36384 invoked by uid 500); 5 Sep 2011 16:15:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 36183 invoked by uid 500); 5 Sep 2011 16:15:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 36175 invoked by uid 99); 5 Sep 2011 16:15:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Sep 2011 16:15:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of simone.tripodi@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.171 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.171] (HELO mail-gx0-f171.google.com) (209.85.161.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Sep 2011 16:15:33 +0000 Received: by gxk22 with SMTP id 22so5094129gxk.30 for ; Mon, 05 Sep 2011 09:15:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=uoipPz1Yu+5n1HeGH3J4OXPPm3FEQht1zkjSyaJUDls=; b=kRR64aLXeAc7hDQn/OjyblcFbfGvM/412y2BBdoKNVwTsp/NWwcYRTDtYVtrwzNtdH uhdZD7xyE3829TVvTGfTGDaIXKjbbyjqaFnGAtXnmK9PNCd9O/iSbM/cM+ykQB0hQKE8 pQByPyNpSUSf7rIdNGjbctvZIHsItIU+aAtl8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.164.9 with SMTP id m9mr2951155ybe.77.1315239312335; Mon, 05 Sep 2011 09:15:12 -0700 (PDT) Sender: simone.tripodi@gmail.com Received: by 10.150.139.5 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 09:15:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 18:15:12 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: SLcmRcRBUIUvuvFiSx-4uVZZ9b0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [CHAIN][VOTE] accept the 2.0-work brach as proper codebase in /trunk From: Simone Tripodi To: Commons Developers List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Jochen! we still haven't because, as emerged in the past discussions, actual modifications can still be considered acceptable in therms of retro-compatibility. Anyway, we are also in the middle of discussions about API redesign, and breaking the 1.X compatibility, so we will update those metadata as soon as that compatibility is broken. Thanks for the reminders! Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 5:37 PM, sebb wrote: > On 5 September 2011 16:33, Jochen Wiedmann wr= ote: >> Housework check: >> >> - =C2=A0Has the package name been changed? >> A- Has thae Maven groupId aand/or artifactId been changed? > > I'd strongly recommend leaving these changes until just before release > - it's much easier to run Clirr if the package name has not been > changed. > >> DAOes t> >> On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 5:13 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote: >>> Hi all guys, >>> thanks to a user, Elijah Zupancic, that recently submitted CHAIN-53, a >>> group of Commons committers started working on that component in a >>> branch 2.0[1] to experiment updates and study improvements in order to >>> push a next release soon. >>> We are in the middle of discussing about the current/improved design, >>> maintaining - or not - the retro-compatibility, better modularization >>> - splitting the chain in submodules - and so on, so as you maybe >>> noticed latest ML activity looks like there is a renewed interest from >>> both committers and users that came back to submit contributions. >>> You would be maybe interested on see which level of >>> retro-compatibility we maintained after the update, by reading the >>> Clirr report[2] published on my personal ASF space. >>> So we are interested on releasing that code and our proposal is to >>> move the current trunk in a 1.x branch and move the 2.0 work in trunk, >>> please cast your vote: >>> >>> [+1] =C2=A0 =C2=A0let's make the branch the code we want to see release= d as new chain >>> [+/- 0] feel free to express opinions >>> [-1] =C2=A0 =C2=A0 because... >>> >>> Feedbacks are, obviously, welcome. >>> Many thanks in advance, all the best!!! >>> Simo >>> >>> [1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/chain/branches/vers= ion-2.0-work >>> [2] http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/chain/clirr-report.html >>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >>> http://www.99soft.org/ >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Capitalism is the astounding belief that the most wickedest of men >> will do the most wickedest of things for the greatest good of >> everyone. >> >> John Maynard Keynes (http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Keynes) >> >> https://linuxcounter.net/user/221257.html >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org