commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jörg Schaible <>
Subject Re: [pool] drop Base(Keyed)ObjectPool?
Date Mon, 19 Sep 2011 08:08:38 GMT
Phil Steitz wrote:

> On 9/18/11 2:43 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> Sure. I was under the Impression that 2 subclasses reused the fields.
> Well, they (GOP, GKOP and others) do use the closed field; but IMO
> that is not enough justification for the complexity of having them
> there and the ugliness of the UnsupportedOperationExceptions and
> nonsense values returned in the base implementations of pool stats.
> So, I will go ahead and remove the base classes.

Or simply use abstract classes and keep only the relevant code?

- Jörg

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message