commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Simone Tripodi <simonetrip...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [pool] drop Base(Keyed)ObjectPool?
Date Mon, 12 Sep 2011 09:32:02 GMT
full support from my side on it, +1
I never understood the usefulness of these classes and they don't help
on writing concrete pool implementations.
Have a nice day, all the best!
Simo

http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/



On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 8:29 PM, Phil Steitz <phil.steitz@gmail.com> wrote:
> These classes really do nothing other than maintain the boolean
> "closed", throwing UnsupportedOperationException or returning
> nonsense for most methods.  The interfaces define contracts, so why
> do we really need these base classes?
>
> Phil
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message