commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Simone Tripodi <simonetrip...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [RESULT][CHAIN][VOTE] accept the 2.0-work brach as proper codebase in /trunk
Date Thu, 08 Sep 2011 18:58:00 GMT
great, looking forward for more contributions Paul!!!
thanks a lot, have a nice day!
Simo

http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/



On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 8:46 PM, Paul Benedict <pbenedict@apache.org> wrote:
> Here's my +1 non-binding.
>
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Simone Tripodi <simonetripodi@apache.org> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> The proposal of making the 2.0-work brach as proper codebase in /trunk
>> for the [chain] component passes with 3 +1 binding votes from
>>
>>  * Simone Tripodi
>>  * James Carman
>>  * Matt Benson
>>
>> no other votes have been casted.
>>
>> I'm going to move the current trunk in a 1.X branch, and the 2.0-work in trunk.
>> Thanks for participating, all the best!
>> Simo
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>> http://www.99soft.org/
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Matt Benson <gudnabrsam@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Simone Tripodi
>>> <simonetripodi@apache.org> wrote:
>>>> Hi all guys,
>>>> thanks to a user, Elijah Zupancic, that recently submitted CHAIN-53, a
>>>> group of Commons committers started working on that component in a
>>>> branch 2.0[1] to experiment updates and study improvements in order to
>>>> push a next release soon.
>>>> We are in the middle of discussing about the current/improved design,
>>>> maintaining - or not - the retro-compatibility, better modularization
>>>> - splitting the chain in submodules - and so on, so as you maybe
>>>> noticed latest ML activity looks like there is a renewed interest from
>>>> both committers and users that came back to submit contributions.
>>>> You would be maybe interested on see which level of
>>>> retro-compatibility we maintained after the update, by reading the
>>>> Clirr report[2] published on my personal ASF space.
>>>> So we are interested on releasing that code and our proposal is to
>>>> move the current trunk in a 1.x branch and move the 2.0 work in trunk,
>>>> please cast your vote:
>>>>
>>>> [+1]    let's make the branch the code we want to see released as new chain
>>>> [+/- 0] feel free to express opinions
>>>> [-1]     because...
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> Matt
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Feedbacks are, obviously, welcome.
>>>> Many thanks in advance, all the best!!!
>>>> Simo
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/chain/branches/version-2.0-work
>>>> [2] http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/chain/clirr-report.html
>>>>
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>>>> http://www.99soft.org/
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message