commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
Subject Re: [pool] drop Base(Keyed)ObjectPool?
Date Mon, 12 Sep 2011 10:18:05 GMT
Phil Steitz <> wrote:

>On 9/11/11 12:44 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> Perhaps we want to keep the ivars in one place since they all have
>> carefully been decorated with final and volatile just in the right
>There is only one field being maintained and I think it would
>actually be clearer to push it into the (small number of) remaining

+1 - happy to see them go

>> What about dropping "Object" from the name? That makes even less
>sense now
>> that we have generics enabled.
>Well, generic or no, what we pool r objects ;)

Object pools make sense to me but I'm not wedded to the name.


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message