commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From ma...@apache.org
Subject Re: [pool] drop Base(Keyed)ObjectPool?
Date Mon, 12 Sep 2011 10:18:05 GMT
Phil Steitz <phil.steitz@gmail.com> wrote:

>On 9/11/11 12:44 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> Perhaps we want to keep the ivars in one place since they all have
>very
>> carefully been decorated with final and volatile just in the right
>places?
>
>There is only one field being maintained and I think it would
>actually be clearer to push it into the (small number of) remaining
>impls.

+1 - happy to see them go

>>
>> What about dropping "Object" from the name? That makes even less
>sense now
>> that we have generics enabled.
>
>Well, generic or no, what we pool r objects ;)

Object pools make sense to me but I'm not wedded to the name.

Mark





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message