Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4F3018987 for ; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 10:36:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 43978 invoked by uid 500); 12 Aug 2011 10:36:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 43261 invoked by uid 500); 12 Aug 2011 10:36:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 42743 invoked by uid 99); 12 Aug 2011 10:35:25 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 10:35:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [217.70.183.196] (HELO relay4-d.mail.gandi.net) (217.70.183.196) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 10:35:15 +0000 X-Originating-IP: 217.70.178.134 Received: from mfilter4-d.gandi.net (mfilter4-d.gandi.net [217.70.178.134]) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CB3B17207E for ; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 12:34:55 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mfilter4-d.gandi.net Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]) by mfilter4-d.gandi.net (mfilter4-d.gandi.net [10.0.15.180]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2xq-wNGGq5P7 for ; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 12:34:53 +0200 (CEST) X-Originating-IP: 209.85.213.171 Received: from mail-yx0-f171.google.com (mail-yx0-f171.google.com [209.85.213.171]) (Authenticated sender: gmail@vafer.org) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 09E7417209C for ; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 12:34:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: by yxk38 with SMTP id 38so1895682yxk.30 for ; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 03:34:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.132.66 with SMTP id c2mr839822ict.254.1313145291372; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 03:34:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.130.1 with HTTP; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 03:34:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <87y5yzroli.fsf@v35516.1blu.de> Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 12:34:51 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [compress] How to move forward with XZ support From: Torsten Curdt To: Commons Developers List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org >> Shading a binary dependency could provide some middle ground. > > Just curious - what is the advantage of shading the jar? It becomes again just one jar with no dependencies ...almost as if we forked the code. cheers, Torsten --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org