Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AD5C878F1 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 15:32:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 3163 invoked by uid 500); 31 Aug 2011 15:32:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 3059 invoked by uid 500); 31 Aug 2011 15:32:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 3051 invoked by uid 99); 31 Aug 2011 15:32:33 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 15:32:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of paulus.benedictus@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.43 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.43] (HELO mail-qw0-f43.google.com) (209.85.216.43) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 15:32:26 +0000 Received: by qwm42 with SMTP id 42so292486qwm.30 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 08:32:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=NRThRsqe/12p/IxElfrRBfwMnVQjNMQwke2K8v86J4g=; b=BWgn8m981hAIJxCjZHMEZ1cq/Ttrjsb1QJLC9ItFhi73SSn3byjbvj5B2VAYoPPnVw Qsda7QlGmXlya4va4mjpNc5918ee06bekL+ndHSdrZnOqXBKN/xM7liVFqj7+Tu8Ki7c nUFBy4Heu29k73xxzPqJGhFquF4vewcrIBeXI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.27.140 with SMTP id t12mr522147vdg.156.1314804726038; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 08:32:06 -0700 (PDT) Sender: paulus.benedictus@gmail.com Received: by 10.220.199.7 with HTTP; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 08:32:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 10:32:05 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 5FlJCmum-PB8ywTgOvcNl6cL8Vk Message-ID: Subject: Re: [chain][discuss] v2 upgrade - follow-up From: Paul Benedict To: Commons Developers List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi all guys, > I noticed that properly setting the 1.5 as target compliance level, > there are some @Override annotations that in cases of interfaces > methods implementation should be dropped. Do you agree on it? Yes, @Override from interfaces is supported only in 1.6 > > Moreover, I'd like to propose to split the chain component, for v2.0, > in a multi-module project: > > - core APIs; > - XML configuration APIs (depends from Digester); > - servlet (depends from Servlet APIs); > - portlet (depends from Portlet APIs); > - faces (depends from Faces APIs). > > in that way users interested on core APIs only don't need to bring > unused code; that looks to me a cleaner common approach used in > various projects inside the ASF (cocoon3, for example) and outside > (i.e. slf4j). What's your opinion about it? > Totally agree. Picking through optional dependencies can be difficult. Though I would like to see the Chain API 2.0 javadoc aggregate all those sub-projects together. I don't think it helps the user if we break things down but can't get the documentation to show the full picture. Paul --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org