Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F1DEC8E22 for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2011 15:06:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 49587 invoked by uid 500); 8 Aug 2011 15:06:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 49195 invoked by uid 500); 8 Aug 2011 15:06:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 49124 invoked by uid 99); 8 Aug 2011 15:06:52 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Aug 2011 15:06:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of simone.tripodi@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.171 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.171] (HELO mail-gx0-f171.google.com) (209.85.161.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Aug 2011 15:06:47 +0000 Received: by gxk22 with SMTP id 22so1324129gxk.30 for ; Mon, 08 Aug 2011 08:06:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=lICCAtgRw+nsh2nF8e/TBWhLjkgRGV6BdEpgi7UIq7U=; b=rKk2lKB/crLbAKXTROA++giSDQgErZwPNiSweV17+4qxI+7PgEgX2YYgC4ZFcXIqC7 roZigrLTg2IXXvt1gYK4j/ybdZWYm227lxhC0SpB4OLu4oJyhl2Pq6857Ga0901aUk7W vQOF0Jw4TQB52H4pw45V4zM7CWaHa7zm4jQb0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.151.153.6 with SMTP id f6mr5754659ybo.42.1312815986685; Mon, 08 Aug 2011 08:06:26 -0700 (PDT) Sender: simone.tripodi@gmail.com Received: by 10.150.218.2 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Aug 2011 08:06:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4E3E617C.60208@apache.org> References: <4E37BC6E.3090201@apache.org> <4E3E617C.60208@apache.org> Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2011 17:06:26 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: jwqAr7rD0zsSevi5tgQFkJc-O9A Message-ID: Subject: Re: [logging] logging vs slf4j From: Simone Tripodi To: Commons Developers List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi all, >> >> If we really have to reconsider this stuff, then I'd propose to >> >> a) Use java.util.logging, because it doesn't require any additional >> dependencies and is guaranteed to work anywhere. >> b) Carefully document how to bridge jul to log4j, because that's >> exactly what's required in almost any application container I am aware >> of. (The exception being Tomcat, which uses jul anyways.) >> c) If the slf4j fans insist, add similar documentation for bridging >> jul to slf4j. > > +1. I like this plan. > +1 I like this plan too. it sounds *very* reasonable: unified, standard (?) way to log, easy to bridge to everything needed. can we ask more? have a nice day, all the best!!! Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org