commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [logging] logging vs slf4j
Date Fri, 05 Aug 2011 06:18:06 GMT
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 7:51 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgregory@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Paul Benedict <pbenedict@apache.org> wrote:
>> I prefer Apache driven projects when possible. If LOG4J2 takes off,
>> feature requests would be implemented quicker, I hope.
>
> I like Log4J just fine thank you very much :)
>
> I'm looking forward to 2.0.

That's generally where I am thought-wise.

A) If you're a generic reusble library; don't do logging if you can help it.
B) If you are an app, use log4j.
C) If you truly need a bridge, use SLF4j.

Hen

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message