commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From S├ębastien Brisard <>
Subject [math] "Abstract" prefix?
Date Sat, 06 Aug 2011 08:38:46 GMT
what's your policy regarding prefixing the name of abstract classes
with "Abstract"? I got the feeling that if there is an underlying
interface, then you add the "abstract"
public interface Foo{...}
public abstract class AbstractFoo{} implements Foo

How about abstract classes which do not implement an interface? Should
we call them Foo or AbstractFoo. Example: should RealLinearOperator
really be called AbstractRealLinearOperator?

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message