commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sébastien Brisard <sebastien.bris...@m4x.org>
Subject Re: [math] Read-only RealVector
Date Thu, 11 Aug 2011 11:10:35 GMT
2011/8/11 sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com>:
> 2011/8/11 Sébastien Brisard <sebastien.brisard@m4x.org>:
>> OK, this I also think would be useful. But my initial question
>> remains, if the object I want to protect is not a RealVector, what do
>> you think of my solution ?
>> Sébastien
>
> If you create the read-only version by subclassing the writable
> version, then you have to ensure that all mutating methods are
> overridden.
> If a base class is later extended to add a new mutator, the protection is lost.
That's quite true... Didn't think of that. It pretty much ruins it, doesn't it?

Sebastien

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message