commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Matt Benson <gudnabr...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [chain][discuss] v2 upgrade - follow-up
Date Wed, 31 Aug 2011 14:46:30 GMT
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Simone Tripodi
<simonetripodi@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi all guys,
> I noticed that properly setting the 1.5 as target compliance level,
> there are some @Override annotations that in cases of interfaces
> methods implementation should be dropped. Do you agree on it?
>
> Moreover, I'd like to propose to split the chain component, for v2.0,
> in a multi-module project:
>
> - core APIs;
> - XML configuration APIs (depends from Digester);
> - servlet (depends from Servlet APIs);
> - portlet (depends from Portlet APIs);
> - faces (depends from Faces APIs).
>
> in that way users interested on core APIs only don't need to bring
> unused code; that looks to me a cleaner common approach used in
> various projects inside the ASF (cocoon3, for example) and outside
> (i.e. slf4j). What's your opinion about it?
>

+1 to all

Matt

> Many thanks in advance, all the best!!!
> Simo
>
> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> http://www.99soft.org/
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 9:37 AM, Simone Tripodi
> <simonetripodi@apache.org> wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>> sorry I'm late but looks like my local timezone sometimes doesn't
>> allow me replying promptly :P
>>
>> @Matt: you are welcome, any time :) Unfortunately I'm not so familiar
>> with [chain] codebase, I cannot be useful ATM :(
>>
>> @Elijah: patches are always welcome ;) For those tests that seems
>> generic, replacing the empty generics with Object should be the trick,
>> or not?
>>
>> Have a nice day, all the best!!!
>> Simo
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>> http://www.99soft.org/
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 10:58 PM, Elijah Zupancic <elijah@zupancic.name> wrote:
>>> Hi Simo,
>>>
>>> Before we look at releasing the changes (after a trunk merge), I think that
>>> we will need to update the documentation to include Generics and possibly
>>> change the unit tests to use Generics. That said - I'm cautious about
>>> changing the unit tests because they are verifying that the API works in its
>>> current form without generics. Do you or anyone else have any thoughts on
>>> this?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> -Elijah
>>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Simone Tripodi
>>> <simonetripodi@apache.org>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all guys,
>>>> I just fixed the clirr report generation and deployed the chain2 site
>>>> on my personal ASF space[1], in order we can discuss the patch that
>>>> Elijah kindly provided.
>>>> WDYT? It is IMHO acceptable in order to apply the modifications in /trunk.
>>>> TIA, all the best!!!
>>>> Simo
>>>>
>>>> [1] http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/chain/clirr-report.html
>>>>
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>>>> http://www.99soft.org/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Simone Tripodi
>>>> <simonetripodi@apache.org> wrote:
>>>> > Hi Matt,
>>>> > your suggestion makes indeed a lot of sense! I'll copy the /trunk to
a
>>>> > branch and publish the site, once applied the patch, on my home@asf
as
>>>> > soon as I have spare time today, so we can discuss together clirr
>>>> > report results.
>>>> > Many thanks for your hint, have a nice day!!!
>>>> > Simo
>>>> >
>>>> > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>>>> > http://www.99soft.org/
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Matt Benson <gudnabrsam@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >> I am generally in favor.  I think it could be good to apply his
patch
>>>> >> on a branch so we can discuss the clirr results and agree on the
>>>> >> severity of the (IMHO forgivable) backward-compatibility breaches.
>>>> >> Then we will understand the proper path forward with respect to
>>>> >> versions and all the changes that cascade from the potential major
>>>> >> version bump.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Matt
>>>> >>
>>>> >> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 1:03 AM, Simone Tripodi
>>>> >> <simonetripodi@apache.org> wrote:
>>>> >>> Hi all guys,
>>>> >>> Elijah, a [chain] user, has been submitting worthy contributions[1]
to
>>>> >>> improve and actualize the commons-chains component, providing
also
>>>> >>> patches[2].
>>>> >>> I think it is the good time to start speaking about the next
[chain]
>>>> >>> version (no new releases/development in the last months), any
>>>> >>> objections on applying Elijah patch?
>>>> >>> I can take care of it but please let me know if anyone else
want to do.
>>>> >>> Many thanks in advance, have a nice day!!!
>>>> >>> Simo
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> [1] http://markmail.org/message/ajh3sunrst7x5klv
>>>> >>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CHAIN-53
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>>>> >>> http://www.99soft.org/
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>>> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message