commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stephen Colebourne <scolebou...@joda.org>
Subject Re: [logging] logging vs slf4j
Date Wed, 03 Aug 2011 09:33:06 GMT
My thought is that there might be some java.util.logging helpers that
could be written, and perhaps they might go in [lang] if there are 5
or fewer classes.

I assume that slf4j and log4j have their own j.u.logging connections,
so that end is dealt with.

The time of [logging] has probably passed.

Stephen


On 3 August 2011 06:50, Henri Yandell <flamefew@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 1:59 AM, Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> wrote:
>> Le 28/07/2011 22:01, Henri Yandell a écrit :
>>>
>>> Personally I'm happy for commons-logging to die. :)
>>
>> Yeah let's use java.util.logging instead :)
>
> Primarily that I don't get the feeling we have a major community of
> developers on c-logging. We implemented it because we needed something
> for our other components (though many simply chose not to log), but it
> was never the passion of anybody here (hopefully not an incorrect
> statement). Robert, Simon and others put in tons of good work, but I
> feel that was duty not passion.
>
> So happy to see it die because it's something that's headed to
> dormancy (be it stable or not).
>
> Hen
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message