commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [logging] logging vs slf4j
Date Wed, 03 Aug 2011 14:51:00 GMT
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Paul Benedict <pbenedict@apache.org> wrote:
> I prefer Apache driven projects when possible. If LOG4J2 takes off,
> feature requests would be implemented quicker, I hope.

I like Log4J just fine thank you very much :)

I'm looking forward to 2.0.

Gary

>
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 9:27 AM, Ralph Goers <ralph.goers@dslextreme.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Aug 3, 2011, at 6:07 AM, David Karlsen wrote:
>>
>>> Hasn't the time for both CL and log4j passed by? The trend nowadays seems to
>>> be slf4j/logback.
>>
>> If you read further back in this thread you will see where I highlighted the problems
in Logback as well as difficulties with SLF4J. Plus, every time Ceki goes on vacation everything
stops.
>>
>> Ralph
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>



-- 
Thank you,
Gary

http://garygregory.wordpress.com/
http://garygregory.com/
http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/
http://twitter.com/GaryGregory

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message