commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Simone Tripodi <simonetrip...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [logging] logging vs slf4j
Date Mon, 08 Aug 2011 15:06:26 GMT
Hi all,

>>
>> If we really have to reconsider this stuff, then I'd propose to
>>
>> a) Use java.util.logging, because it doesn't require any additional
>> dependencies and is guaranteed to work anywhere.
>> b) Carefully document how to bridge jul to log4j, because that's
>> exactly what's required in almost any application container I am aware
>> of. (The exception being Tomcat, which uses jul anyways.)
>> c) If the slf4j fans insist, add similar documentation for bridging
>> jul to slf4j.
>
> +1. I like this plan.
>

+1 I like this plan too. it sounds *very* reasonable: unified,
standard (?) way to log, easy to bridge to everything needed.
can we ask more?
have a nice day, all the best!!!
Simo

http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message