commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Simone Tripodi <simonetrip...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [logging] logging vs slf4j
Date Fri, 05 Aug 2011 11:06:50 GMT
Well said Hen, big +1 :)

>
> B) If you are an app, use log4j.
or logback, depending on the cases, IMHO
>

Simo

http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/



On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 8:18 AM, Henri Yandell <flamefew@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 7:51 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgregory@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Paul Benedict <pbenedict@apache.org> wrote:
>>> I prefer Apache driven projects when possible. If LOG4J2 takes off,
>>> feature requests would be implemented quicker, I hope.
>>
>> I like Log4J just fine thank you very much :)
>>
>> I'm looking forward to 2.0.
>
> That's generally where I am thought-wise.
>
> A) If you're a generic reusble library; don't do logging if you can help it.
> B) If you are an app, use log4j.
> C) If you truly need a bridge, use SLF4j.
>
> Hen
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message