commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ralph Goers <>
Subject Re: [logging] logging vs slf4j
Date Thu, 04 Aug 2011 01:51:02 GMT
The flaw would be in JBoss Portal, not the portlet spec. The spec doesn't have anything to
do with logging.


On Aug 3, 2011, at 11:18 AM, Antonio Petrelli wrote:

> 2011/8/3 Antonio Petrelli <>
>> However in my experience SLF4J has a big drawback: when used in a shared
>> classloader (JBoss Portal anyone?) it is needed to have the same stinky old
>> version of SLF4J in all applications during compile time, and the library
>> should be excluded from the package.
> Correcting myself, this is a flaw in JBoss Portal and/or the portlet
> specification, because they need a shared classloader to work, the same
> problem would happen using commons-logging.
> Antonio

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message