commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>
Subject Re: [logging] logging vs slf4j
Date Thu, 04 Aug 2011 01:51:02 GMT
The flaw would be in JBoss Portal, not the portlet spec. The spec doesn't have anything to
do with logging.

Ralph

On Aug 3, 2011, at 11:18 AM, Antonio Petrelli wrote:

> 2011/8/3 Antonio Petrelli <antonio.petrelli@gmail.com>
> 
>> However in my experience SLF4J has a big drawback: when used in a shared
>> classloader (JBoss Portal anyone?) it is needed to have the same stinky old
>> version of SLF4J in all applications during compile time, and the library
>> should be excluded from the package.
>> 
> 
> Correcting myself, this is a flaw in JBoss Portal and/or the portlet
> specification, because they need a shared classloader to work, the same
> problem would happen using commons-logging.
> 
> Antonio


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message