commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Oliver Heger <oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Configuration 1.7 based on RC1
Date Sun, 28 Aug 2011 19:10:48 GMT
Am 28.08.2011 17:31, schrieb Gary Gregory:
> The Javadocs links to the JRE are broken:
>
> [ERROR] Error fetching link:
> http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/api/package-list. Ignored it.
>
> The URL to use is:
>
> http://download.oracle.com/javase/1.4.2/docs/api/
>
> Not a blocker, but not pretty either. It makes the Javadoc less convenient.

I also saw this message in the build log, however it does not seem to 
affect the Javadocs generated: the links to JDK classes work fine. Also, 
there is no specific configuration for Javadocs in the pom. Is this 
inherited from the parent pom?

Oliver

>
> Gary
>
> On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Oliver Heger<oliver.heger@oliver-heger.de
>> wrote:
>
>> Am 28.08.2011 13:15, schrieb Luc Maisonobe:
>>
>>   Le 28/08/2011 12:51, Oliver Heger a écrit :
>>>
>>>> This is a vote to release Apache Commons Configuration 1.7 based on the
>>>> first RC.
>>>>
>>>> Tag:
>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/**asf/commons/proper/**configuration/tags/**
>>>> CONFIGURATION_1_7RC1/<http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/configuration/tags/CONFIGURATION_1_7RC1/>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Distributions: http://people.apache.org/~**oheger/configuration-1.7rc1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eoheger/configuration-1.7rc1/>
>>>>
>>>> Maven artifacts:
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~**oheger/configuration-1.7rc1/**maven/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eoheger/configuration-1.7rc1/maven/>
>>>>
>>>> Site: http://people.apache.org/~**oheger/configuration-1.7rc1/**site/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eoheger/configuration-1.7rc1/site/>
>>>>
>>>> [ ] +1 release it
>>>> [ ] +0 go ahead I don't care
>>>> [ ] -1 no, do not release it because...
>>>>
>>>
>>> When running junit tests, there are many exceptions thrown, which
>>> appears as [WARN] messages. However, the tests pass. Is this expected
>>> behavior ?
>>>
>>
>> Yes, this is okay, e.g. for tests checking error conditions. You are right
>> that the tests are a bit verbose, but I hope that this is not a big issue.
>>
>> Thanks for checking the RC.
>> Oliver
>>
>>
>>
>>> Luc
>>>
>>>
>>>> Vote will remain open for 72 hours.
>>>>
>>>> Oliver
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------**------------------------------**
>>>> ---------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.**apache.org<dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org>
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------**------------------------------**---------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.**apache.org<dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org>
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ------------------------------**------------------------------**---------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.**apache.org<dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org>
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message