commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Phil Steitz <>
Subject Re: Nexus vs rsync-repository releases
Date Wed, 03 Aug 2011 21:14:58 GMT
On 8/3/11 2:14 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 8/3/11 1:37 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 6:32 AM, Henri Yandell <> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 9:30 PM, Phil Steitz <> wrote:
>>>> On 8/2/11 5:22 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 7:23 AM, Emmanuel Bourg <>
>>>>>> Are we still going to deploy Maven artifacts by SCPing to
>>>>>> m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository on
>>>>>> I've been discussing the permissions issue for the old groupIds on
>>>>>> with the Infra team (i.e components using the old groupId
>>>>>> commons-<componentname> need a specific configuration on the
snapshot and
>>>>>> release repositories).
>>>>>> Brian Demers kindly proposed to allow the deployment of all commons-*
>>>>>> on Nexus, but it would require to block the deployment through
>>>>>> to avoid metadata conflicts.
>>>>>> Do we all agree on using exclusively Nexus for our releases?
>>>> I would prefer to leave the door open to release more point releases
>>>> of [pool] and [dbcp] 1.x using the working scripts that i have, so
>>>> pls do not nuke those.  The new versions are in the org.apache
>>>> groupId tree, so we will have no choice but to use nexus for those.
>>>> I will have agree to use nexus for the maven repo bits, but prefer
>>>> to create the actual release artifacts locally, examine them, call a
>>>> VOTE on them and move the same bits to /dist.  Personally, I would
>>>> rather see us move back the other way (use the Tomcat setup, with
>>>> Ant tasks pushing to p.a.o/rysnch), but I can see I am in the
>>>> minority here, so will not stand in the way.
>>> Well, I'm in the same minority and I'm not aware it's a minority (have
>>> we taken a vote from those release managing?).
>> Me too. When maven works, its great - but when it doesn't it makes you
>> want to tear your hair out. The only releases I've done using the
>> release plugin were commons-parent & the build plugin. That was a
>> while ago, but more often than not there were issues.
> Hmm....  Based on comments on this thread, looks like I may not be
> in the minority on this.
> I am willing to do the following:
> 0) Either a) create an Ant deployment script similar to what Tomcat
> uses [1] or b) create a generic bash script that can be run from
> p.a.o to deploy from ~rm/foo-x.y.x-RCw
> 1) Update the web site docs so we have full and working documentation
> Either of the options in 0) require that we move back to publishing
> from ibiblio-rsync from p.a.o (and we have to be able to get this
> reverted - not sure this is even possible at this point, but we
> could ask).  If we decide to start publishing snapshots, we can use
> the same approach for these. 

Forgot the link:
> Phil
>> Niall
>>> Nexus, Maven release-plugin, they all fire off my keep-it-simple
>>> warning flags. They mistake magic for simplicity.
>>> Hen
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> For additional commands, e-mail:

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message