Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" <dev@commons.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jak-commons-dev@m.gmane.org
 designates 80.91.229.12 as permitted sender)
Mail-Followup-To: dev@commons.apache.org
To: dev@commons.apache.org
From: =?UTF-8?B?SsO2cmc=?= Schaible <joerg.schaible@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [lang] Contexted exception [Re: [lang] Time for RC3?]
Followup-To: gmane.comp.jakarta.commons.devel
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2011 22:31:21 +0200
Lines: 30
Message-ID: <iv552p$jsb$1@dough.gmane.org>
References: 
 <CACzrW9CQ+Yakbi+wNHb92z3eGrn9W4mfGW85f5cshtzpf8E2BQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <iv42uc$ldq$1@dough.gmane.org>
 <CACzrW9AoyW2Bf=Ank3cG2VD+KK-E-Ny8p+7bd+TznwNNJ8=nHQ@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: joerg.schaible@gmx.de
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
User-Agent: KNode/4.4.11

Stephen Colebourne wrote:

> On 7 July 2011 11:48, Jörg Schaible <joerg.schaible@scalaris.com> wrote:
>> One last opinion about the output? Originally we had e.g.:
>>
>> [Handler = PersonConverter]
>> [Current Element = Person]
>> [Role = COO]
>> [Handler[1] = CompanyConverter]
>> [Current Element[1] = Company]
>>
>> The current output does no longer have the "[1]" numbering at the keys.
>> However, I wonder if the plain output sequence is now enough for easy
>> analysis, whether I should add those indexes again (for the formatted
>> message only) or should add an additional element numbering e.g. like:
>>
>> [1:Handler = PersonConverter]
>> [2:Current Element = Person]
>> [3:Role = COO]
>> [4:Handler = CompanyConverter]
>> [5:Current Element = Company]
> 
> The default message should probably have numbering as per  [1:Handler
> = PersonConverter]
> Stephen

Done.

- Jörg


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org