Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3C9016F78 for ; Wed, 6 Jul 2011 23:58:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 81385 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2011 23:58:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 81289 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2011 23:58:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 81281 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jul 2011 23:58:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Jul 2011 23:58:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jak-commons-dev@m.gmane.org designates 80.91.229.12 as permitted sender) Received: from [80.91.229.12] (HELO lo.gmane.org) (80.91.229.12) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Jul 2011 23:58:15 +0000 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qebyb-0000NQ-Q1 for dev@commons.apache.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2011 01:57:53 +0200 Received: from hsi-kbw-046-005-048-163.hsi8.kabel-badenwuerttemberg.de ([46.5.48.163]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 07 Jul 2011 01:57:53 +0200 Received: from joerg.schaible by hsi-kbw-046-005-048-163.hsi8.kabel-badenwuerttemberg.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 07 Jul 2011 01:57:53 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: dev@commons.apache.org To: dev@commons.apache.org From: =?UTF-8?B?SsO2cmc=?= Schaible Subject: Re: [lang] Time for RC3? Followup-To: gmane.comp.jakarta.commons.devel Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2011 01:57:42 +0200 Lines: 26 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: joerg.schaible@gmx.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: hsi-kbw-046-005-048-163.hsi8.kabel-badenwuerttemberg.de Mail-Copies-To: nobody User-Agent: KNode/4.4.11 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Stephen, Stephen Colebourne wrote: > On 6 July 2011 21:45, Jörg Schaible wrote: >> Since the ExceptionContext is especially designed for an exception >> mix-in, I wonder if we better use more qualifying names for this use >> case: >> >> interface ExceptionContext { >> addContextValue(...); >> setContextValue(...); >> getContextValues(...); >> ... >> }; >> >> Opinions? > > Yes. It needs to be the longer names for clarity. > Stephen Proposed changes done. Please review, especially also Javadoc as I'm a non- native speaker. - Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org