Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6CED47B9E for ; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 01:17:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 85343 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2011 01:17:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 84984 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2011 01:17:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 84959 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jul 2011 01:17:53 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 01:17:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of flamefew@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.171 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.171] (HELO mail-qy0-f171.google.com) (209.85.216.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 01:17:44 +0000 Received: by qyl38 with SMTP id 38so151383qyl.9 for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 18:17:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=z32f0Rr2QqTdiWniK6gt31wnsa9m8NjUk0U+OloJf1g=; b=mlv1onhgB0CSx4zIgxYMh2NPqPM8gtYE4htJHmfPfvUy1gpZxpbkAc6tgwMT9q8TMq 2st81OdM9xYoAK5yp3i+4ohBKY4S/LPetnKco29XA6rI6bVlagi0/asGKTOnD9296KgX bL7/ACetlzhC26ceIFTofPXVVK/o9oY5INRkk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.184.6 with SMTP id ci6mr2168193qcb.202.1310692643093; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 18:17:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.86.206 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 18:17:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 18:17:23 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] [LANG] Release Commons Lang 3.0 (based on RC4) From: Henri Yandell To: Commons Developers List , joerg.schaible@gmx.de Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 4:06 PM, J=F6rg Schaible wr= ote: > Hi Hen, > > Henri Yandell wrote: > >> Lang is ready to consider 3.0 release again. >> >> RC4 is available here: >> >> =A0http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/ >> >> SVN: >> >> =A0http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/lang/tags/LANG_3_0_RC4= / >> >> Maven artifacts: >> >> =A0http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/maven/ >> >> Website: >> >> =A0http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/site/ >> >> Note that there is a 2.6->3.0 Clirr report in the site that may prove >> useful: >> >> =A0http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/site/lang2-lan= g3- > clirr--report.html >> >> This vote will close no sooner than in 72 hours time, 0500 GMT 16 July >> 2011. >> >> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >> =A0 [ ] +1 >> =A0 [ ] -1, with reason >> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >> >> Hen >> >> *fingers crossed - two of my children are younger than the Lang 3.0 >> effort* > > As usual I build from the source tarball with my compiler zoo. > > A test fails with IBM JDK 6, because the test makes wrong assumptions abo= ut > the implementation details of ArrayList delivered by the runtime: > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D %< =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > Failed tests: > =A0testReflectionHierarchyArrayList(org.apache.commons.lang3.builder.ToSt= ringBuilderTest): > null > expected:<....ArrayList@115b115b[[elementData=3D{,,,,,,,,,},size=3D0],modCount=3D0]> > but > was:<....ArrayList@115b115b[[firstIndex=3D0,lastIndex=3D0,array=3D{= ,,,,,,,,,}],modCount= =3D0]> > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D %< =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Can you open up a JIRA Item for this one? I don't think it's a release blocker, but we should fix it in 3.0.1. > You're already fixed the issues of the checkstyle report in trunk. > > > Site problems: > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > > 1/ Users Guide, 1: The description misses the fact that Lang3 can be used > side-by-side with a previous version Very good point. > 2/ Users Guide, 2: Head of page contains a link for "lang3.exception.*", = but > no section exists. Good catch. > 3/ Release History/release notes for 3.0: The "coloring" fails in the bot= tom > of the page due to single quotes in the text Ditto :) > 4/ Building: Misses the link for the upgrade notes to 3.0 in the list Good catch - forgot this page existed :) > 5/ Distribution Management: Report should be disabled, links are not vali= d > for users Any idea how? > 6/ Changes Report: Claims 3.0 to be unreleased Yeah, need to put whatever date the release is when pushing the final site = up. > None of this is a blocker though, therefore +1 *cheer* :) I'll aim to hit all before release (bar distribution management); but anyone else should feel free to tweak the site. Whenever we successfully release I'll deploy a site from trunk instead of the RC'd version. Hen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org