Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" <dev@commons.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of flamefew@gmail.com designates
 209.85.216.43 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAAqLGLO9WsPU=_exMsKZkC9pJvPq=S8AnQjjg4_8v4=N7dOojQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAAqLGLO9WsPU=_exMsKZkC9pJvPq=S8AnQjjg4_8v4=N7dOojQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 13:01:24 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CAPVuaYspFrdqa5diX2uNqd=3=eYiMfC5Tfr5470v6m_GeX6Mwg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [logging] logging vs slf4j
From: Henri Yandell <flamefew@gmail.com>
To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Personally I'm happy for commons-logging to die. :)

On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Simone Tripodi
<simonetripodi@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi all guys,
> I remember I raw a thread - not sure if I did it here at commons or
> somewhere else here at apache - where specified we prefer adding
> [logging] as components dependency instead of slf4j...
> Did I just get crazy or someone can point me to the right direction please? :)
> Many thanks in advance, all the best!!!
> Simo
>
> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> http://www.99soft.org/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org