Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 331157F1D for ; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 22:36:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 63488 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jul 2011 22:36:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 63400 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jul 2011 22:36:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 63391 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jul 2011 22:36:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 22:36:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jodastephen@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.43 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.43] (HELO mail-qw0-f43.google.com) (209.85.216.43) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 22:36:48 +0000 Received: by qwf6 with SMTP id 6so2225578qwf.30 for ; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 15:36:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=IRYVprKzERwL0QTedUEWTSIemPxA6eX4CCwuPU6A4+s=; b=U3tQfI1N7fOBnKqQQHd6ZuC/dGYu41mEX9bE5LTHa+TMoC+348laO/7/3VTocxqbJZ AoNWmyB8i+ffI2M25NuPNNou8Xf1DtdgFG9ya6UR2lcbcumCoBkzIabdVzuacASyNNEg M6iOqbPDHF6JKx95VkX/NvW2x1Kr57KiiinjA= Received: by 10.229.69.133 with SMTP id z5mr2947176qci.82.1311028587091; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 15:36:27 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: jodastephen@gmail.com Received: by 10.229.19.205 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 15:36:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Stephen Colebourne Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 23:36:07 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: pLBF5VQgB7n9XwZGFzO7cNUfcds Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] [LANG] Release Commons Lang 3.0 (based on RC4) To: Commons Developers List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I'm willing to vote +1 Although I haven't checked every recent change, but AFAIK recent changes have been minor and my previous issues are resolved. I would note that the svn as of right now does not compile, due to an IOUtils reference that shouldn't be there. Stephen On 16 July 2011 01:18, Henri Yandell wrote: > Thanks Gary. > > So 4 +1s. > > Stephen, Niall, Paul, Phil, Sebb, James - nudge to consider voting > (apologies if I missed anyone else who has committed to Lang 3.0)? > > Hen > > On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Gary Gregory w= rote: >> That's true too. In the spirit of release early, release often, I remove= my >> -1 :) >> >> Gary >> >> >>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Henri Yandell wro= te: >>> >>>> Less that it is painful (though I agree that it is), more that if you >>>> hold up a release for every bug that comes in then you continually sit >>>> in a non-releasing state. We have a really bad habit of that in >>>> Commons, constantly polishing and polishing before a release. >>>> >>>> Hen >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 6:58 AM, Gary Gregory >>>> wrote: >>>> > Here is my main issue: we are releasing a major new version and ther= e is >>>> a >>>> > known bug reported by a user which has been fixed in SVN. It feels l= ike >>>> we >>>> > are unwilling to cut a new RC because our build process and validati= on >>>> is >>>> > painful (it is so in my experience at least, your mileage may vary u= sing >>>> > custom scripts, Nexus, or other incantations.) This is not a good re= ason >>>> IMO >>>> > to avoid rebuilding. In the case of a major release like 3.0, I do n= ot >>>> want >>>> > to leave a bad taste in a user's mouth with a class that is not full= y >>>> baked, >>>> > especially in code new to 3.0. I like that we are planning a 3.0.1, = but >>>> I do >>>> > not see why we should not include something that is already fixed fo= r >>>> 3.0. >>>> > It's not like this issue needs more time on investigating, coding, a= nd >>>> > testing. >>>> > >>>> > Now, if you all really think I am being unreasonable, I'll be happy = to >>>> go >>>> > with the flow and reverse -1, but for now, I wanted to express my fu= ll >>>> POV. >>>> > >>>> > Thank you for reading and talking :) >>>> > >>>> > Gary >>>> > >>>> > On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 3:44 AM, Henri Yandell >>>> wrote: >>>> >> >>>> >> Waiting on you to determine whether your -1 is still there on LANG-= 720. >>>> >> >>>> >> Then need to poke Niall, Stephen et al to do a review :) >>>> >> >>>> >> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Gary Gregory >>> > >>>> >> wrote: >>>> >> > -1, let's pick up the committed fix for >>>> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-720 >>>> >> > >>>> >> > I recall seeing traffic in the escape/unescape area so it makes s= ense >>>> to >>>> >> > polish this new code as much as possible IMO. >>>> >> > >>>> >> > Gary >>>> >> > >>>> >> > On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 12:47 AM, Henri Yandell >>>> >> > wrote: >>>> >> > >>>> >> >> Lang is ready to consider 3.0 release again. >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> RC4 is available here: >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> =A0http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/ >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> SVN: >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/lang/tags/LANG_3_0_RC4/ >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> Maven artifacts: >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> =A0http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/maven/ >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> Website: >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> =A0http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/site/ >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> Note that there is a 2.6->3.0 Clirr report in the site that may >>>> prove >>>> >> >> useful: >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/site/lang2-lang= 3-clirr--report.html >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> This vote will close no sooner than in 72 hours time, 0500 GMT 1= 6 >>>> July >>>> >> >> 2011. >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >>>> >> >> =A0[ ] +1 >>>> >> >> =A0[ ] -1, with reason >>>> >> >> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> Hen >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> *fingers crossed - two of my children are younger than the Lang = 3.0 >>>> >> >> effort* >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org >>>> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > -- >>>> >> > Thank you, >>>> >> > Gary >>>> >> > >>>> >> > http://garygregory.wordpress.com/ >>>> >> > http://garygregory.com/ >>>> >> > http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/ >>>> >> > http://twitter.com/GaryGregory >>>> >> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > -- >>>> > Thank you, >>>> > Gary >>>> > >>>> > http://garygregory.wordpress.com/ >>>> > http://garygregory.com/ >>>> > http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/ >>>> > http://twitter.com/GaryGregory >>>> > >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Thank you, >>> Gary >>> >>> http://garygregory.wordpress.com/ >>> http://garygregory.com/ >>> http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/ >>> http://twitter.com/GaryGregory >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Thank you, >> Gary >> >> http://garygregory.wordpress.com/ >> http://garygregory.com/ >> http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/ >> http://twitter.com/GaryGregory >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org