Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" <dev@commons.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jodastephen@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.216.43 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: jodastephen@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: 
 <CACZkXPyEvc4DtGuJ5F1V8vRw5W2pnvVkxqTq0fjLBFv=g1TxHQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CACzrW9DxarSN5TnguhA33sPwErrbHKvvw87z3X+m6WRvSNM3Cg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CACZkXPyEvc4DtGuJ5F1V8vRw5W2pnvVkxqTq0fjLBFv=g1TxHQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Stephen Colebourne <scolebourne@joda.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 16:49:40 +0100
Message-ID: 
 <CACzrW9DPCr=_KoJs_grW-X13J-OActerzX3+rW9a4jbqUW5QJw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [lang] IOUtils in tests [Re: [VOTE] [LANG] Release Commons Lang
 3.0 (based on RC4)]
To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On 19 July 2011 16:32, Gary Gregory <garydgregory@gmail.com> wrote:
> When you say "Personally, I'm OK with using JUnit and mocking utilities as
> they are both specifically intended for testing." are you thinking that
> there are alternative solutions?. IMO, JUnit is a requirement, not something
> we should even consider cutting and pasting, not something that is just "OK"
> to depend on, it is an established standard for this project.

That was an 'ok' as in good. We should depend on JUnit/mocking, not copy them!

IOUtils is an end user library, and depending on it makes the test
more of an integration test.

Stephen

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org