Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" <dev@commons.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of phil.steitz@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.210.41 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <4E2C9BAB.6000508@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2011 15:24:43 -0700
From: Phil Steitz <phil.steitz@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6;
 rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [math] Inherits doc and @Override
References: <1311315486.2827.2.camel@knuffelchen>
 <20110724221359.GI7045@dusk.harfang.homelinux.org>
In-Reply-To: <20110724221359.GI7045@dusk.harfang.homelinux.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 7/24/11 3:13 PM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> Hello.
>
>> I saw in the sources serveral /** {@inheritDoc} */ on methods with
>> @Override annotation. Javadoc knows to inherit the javadoc of the
>> overwritten methos, so there is no need for @inheritDoc.
>> If all agree, one could drop this if the code is modified?  
> CheckStyle complains if there isn't a Javadoc block.

Right, and including it creates a placeholder to expand on or modify
the inherited javadoc.  I think we should keep it.

Phil
>
>
> Regards,
> Gilles
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org