commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] [LANG] Release Commons Lang 3.0 (based on RC4)
Date Tue, 19 Jul 2011 01:25:09 GMT
Interesting issue; though thankfully it's post RC4 so not an issue wrt
releasing 3.0.

Assuming (for argument's sake) that IO Test depends on Lang & Lang
Test depends on IO; is this bad? I'm not convinced it is. Dealing with
something like that is something the build system needs to know how to
do.

Hen

On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Stephen Colebourne
<scolebourne@joda.org> wrote:
> StringEscapeUtils test includes IOUtils, which it shouldn't. (If its
> been added as a dependency, then it needs to be removed, even for
> testing)
>
> Stephen
>
> On 18 July 2011 23:41, Gary Gregory <garydgregory@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Jul 18, 2011, at 18:36, Stephen Colebourne <scolebourne@joda.org> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm willing to vote +1
>>> Although I haven't checked every recent change, but AFAIK recent
>>> changes have been minor and my previous issues are resolved.
>>>
>>> I would note that the svn as of right now does not compile, due to an
>>> IOUtils reference that shouldn't be
>>
>> Hi Stephen,
>>
>> Can you specify what your error is? I check both the maven and ant
>> builds before my commit.
>>
>> Gary
>>
>>>
>>> Stephen
>>>
>>>
>>> On 16 July 2011 01:18, Henri Yandell <flamefew@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Thanks Gary.
>>>>
>>>> So 4 +1s.
>>>>
>>>> Stephen, Niall, Paul, Phil, Sebb, James - nudge to consider voting
>>>> (apologies if I missed anyone else who has committed to Lang 3.0)?
>>>>
>>>> Hen
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Gary Gregory <garydgregory@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>> That's true too. In the spirit of release early, release often, I remove
my
>>>>> -1 :)
>>>>>
>>>>> Gary
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Henri Yandell <flamefew@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Less that it is painful (though I agree that it is), more that
if you
>>>>>>> hold up a release for every bug that comes in then you continually
sit
>>>>>>> in a non-releasing state. We have a really bad habit of that
in
>>>>>>> Commons, constantly polishing and polishing before a release.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hen
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 6:58 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgregory@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Here is my main issue: we are releasing a major new version
and there is
>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>> known bug reported by a user which has been fixed in SVN.
It feels like
>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>> are unwilling to cut a new RC because our build process and
validation
>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>> painful (it is so in my experience at least, your mileage
may vary using
>>>>>>>> custom scripts, Nexus, or other incantations.) This is not
a good reason
>>>>>>> IMO
>>>>>>>> to avoid rebuilding. In the case of a major release like
3.0, I do not
>>>>>>> want
>>>>>>>> to leave a bad taste in a user's mouth with a class that
is not fully
>>>>>>> baked,
>>>>>>>> especially in code new to 3.0. I like that we are planning
a 3.0.1, but
>>>>>>> I do
>>>>>>>> not see why we should not include something that is already
fixed for
>>>>>>> 3.0.
>>>>>>>> It's not like this issue needs more time on investigating,
coding, and
>>>>>>>> testing.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Now, if you all really think I am being unreasonable, I'll
be happy to
>>>>>>> go
>>>>>>>> with the flow and reverse -1, but for now, I wanted to express
my full
>>>>>>> POV.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thank you for reading and talking :)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Gary
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 3:44 AM, Henri Yandell <flamefew@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Waiting on you to determine whether your -1 is still
there on LANG-720.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Then need to poke Niall, Stephen et al to do a review
:)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgregory@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> -1, let's pick up the committed fix for
>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-720
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I recall seeing traffic in the escape/unescape area
so it makes sense
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>> polish this new code as much as possible IMO.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Gary
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 12:47 AM, Henri Yandell <flamefew@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Lang is ready to consider 3.0 release again.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> RC4 is available here:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>  http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> SVN:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/lang/tags/LANG_3_0_RC4/
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Maven artifacts:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>  http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/maven/
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Website:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>  http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/site/
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Note that there is a 2.6->3.0 Clirr report
in the site that may
>>>>>>> prove
>>>>>>>>>>> useful:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/site/lang2-lang3-clirr--report.html
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> This vote will close no sooner than in 72 hours
time, 0500 GMT 16
>>>>>>> July
>>>>>>>>>>> 2011.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ================
>>>>>>>>>>>  [ ] +1
>>>>>>>>>>>  [ ] -1, with reason
>>>>>>>>>>> ================
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hen
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> *fingers crossed - two of my children are younger
than the Lang 3.0
>>>>>>>>>>> effort*
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>>>>>> Gary
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> http://garygregory.wordpress.com/
>>>>>>>>>> http://garygregory.com/
>>>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/
>>>>>>>>>> http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>>>> Gary
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://garygregory.wordpress.com/
>>>>>>>> http://garygregory.com/
>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/
>>>>>>>> http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>> Gary
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://garygregory.wordpress.com/
>>>>>> http://garygregory.com/
>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/
>>>>>> http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>> Gary
>>>>>
>>>>> http://garygregory.wordpress.com/
>>>>> http://garygregory.com/
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/
>>>>> http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message