commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stephen Colebourne <scolebou...@joda.org>
Subject Re: [lang] Contexted exception [Re: [lang] Time for RC3?]
Date Thu, 07 Jul 2011 10:53:49 GMT
On 7 July 2011 11:48, Jörg Schaible <joerg.schaible@scalaris.com> wrote:
> One last opinion about the output? Originally we had e.g.:
>
>  [Handler = PersonConverter]
>  [Current Element = Person]
>  [Role = COO]
>  [Handler[1] = CompanyConverter]
>  [Current Element[1] = Company]
>
> The current output does no longer have the "[1]" numbering at the keys.
> However, I wonder if the plain output sequence is now enough for easy
> analysis, whether I should add those indexes again (for the formatted
> message only) or should add an additional element numbering e.g. like:
>
>  [1:Handler = PersonConverter]
>  [2:Current Element = Person]
>  [3:Role = COO]
>  [4:Handler = CompanyConverter]
>  [5:Current Element = Company]

The default message should probably have numbering as per  [1:Handler
= PersonConverter]
Stephen

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message