commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Greg Sterijevski <gsterijev...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [math] Re: Longley Data
Date Tue, 12 Jul 2011 04:07:53 GMT
Yes, my apologies. I am a bit new to this.


On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 10:59 PM, Henri Yandell <flamefew@gmail.com> wrote:

> I'm assuming this is Commons Math. I've added a [math] so it catches
> the interest of those involved.
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 8:52 PM, Greg Sterijevski
> <gsterijevski@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Additionally, I pass all of the Wampler beta estimates.
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 10:40 PM, Greg Sterijevski
> > <gsterijevski@gmail.com>wrote:
> >
> >> Hello All,
> >>
> >> I am testing the first 'updating' ols regression algorithm. I ran it
> >> through the Wampler1 data. It gets 1.0s for all of the beta estimates. I
> >> next ran the Longley dataset. I match, but with a tolerance of 1.0e-6.
> This
> >> is a bit less than two orders of magnitude worse than the current incore
> >> estimator( 2.0e-8). My question to the list, is how important is this
> diff?
> >> Is it worth tearing things apart to figure out where the error is
> >> accumulating?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> -Greg
> >>
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message