commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Simone Tripodi <simonetrip...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [logging] logging vs slf4j
Date Thu, 28 Jul 2011 20:08:08 GMT
hahahaha :D

I asked because there's one user that proposed a [chain] evolution,
and one of suggested improvements is migrating over slf4j - I
(wrongly, maybe) suggested  to keep [logging] because here at commons
we continue using it but, as said, I maybe reported a wrong fact.

Do we encourage such kind of migrations or we are more conservative?
Many thanks in advance, all the best!!!
Simo

http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/



On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:01 PM, Henri Yandell <flamefew@gmail.com> wrote:
> Personally I'm happy for commons-logging to die. :)
>
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Simone Tripodi
> <simonetripodi@apache.org> wrote:
>> Hi all guys,
>> I remember I raw a thread - not sure if I did it here at commons or
>> somewhere else here at apache - where specified we prefer adding
>> [logging] as components dependency instead of slf4j...
>> Did I just get crazy or someone can point me to the right direction please? :)
>> Many thanks in advance, all the best!!!
>> Simo
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>> http://www.99soft.org/
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message