commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>
Subject Re: [logging] logging vs slf4j
Date Fri, 29 Jul 2011 17:42:00 GMT
Commons Logging takes a least common denominator approach, which makes it useful for only fairly
simple use cases.  The goals for Log4J 2 are much more extensive than just a simple API that
wraps other logging frameworks.  

Ralph

On Jul 29, 2011, at 6:19 AM, Paul Benedict wrote:

> Would there be any merit in combining the log4j and commons logging
> code? Given a hypothetical Log4j 2 and JCL 2, how much different could
> they really be in terms of their goals and add-ins?
> 
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 4:51 AM, Gilles Sadowski
> <gilles@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote:
>> Hello.
>> 
>>> I would have done that but some of the deficiencies are in the API and I couldn't
get Ceki to incorporate them.
>> 
>> Do you have a pointer to a listing of those deficiencies?
>> 
>>> [...]
>> 
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Gilles
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>> 
>> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message