commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ralph Goers <>
Subject Re: [vfs] mvn3 eclipse fails
Date Wed, 27 Jul 2011 00:39:02 GMT
I'm afraid I don't understand what you are proposing.


On Jul 26, 2011, at 4:43 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:

> Hi Ralph,
> Ralph Goers wrote:
>> For some reason Christian's message didn't arrive in the proper email
>> folder so I never saw it.
>> Actually, the real problem here isn't as much the LICENSE and NOTICE files
>> as it is checkstyle.xml.  It would be bad to have copy of that file in
>> each sub-folder as the checkstyle rules would be likely to get out of
>> synch.  However, it is probably good to have a single copy of the other
>> files as well.
> For the generated Eclipse project it is the additional resource (and 
> testResource) definition of those two files in the commons-parent. It will 
> *always* create a non-usable Eclipse project. Therefore I wonder if we can 
> take the same approach for the main and test artifact as we do for the 
> javadoc - simply by using the antrun plugin instead. This would prevent the 
> addition of the basedir to the classpath.
> - Jörg
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> For additional commands, e-mail:

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message