Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" <dev@commons.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of sebbaz@gmail.com designates
 209.85.212.43 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=TdeoGdz85Ddp03wTkKVWmqb9jF/6MtQFFHtIQEc+QaxEHdmeODH+KWkM+8KIC0Neyh
         7IRVU1ujuHgd+l8V71SW+xynCRNEmhQmh8vGKaHCLC7oLYgcDLb6lo1Dc0Eb9QThmlul
         Y9CNJTwoCa+V9uTQT4YC5stSmm3eIn5jRrA2s=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTik6JEj__47=OkyGgyUAx49SURdWMQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20110626170221.3F1E72388906@eris.apache.org>
	<BANLkTimYRDp42=WPXFJ+VD6i-aAo07MQKA@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110627101317.GM10648@dusk.harfang.homelinux.org>
	<BANLkTik6JEj__47=OkyGgyUAx49SURdWMQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 22:32:29 +0100
Message-ID: <BANLkTing2Pn_z65xKfVSFxcq11FKL8V+Uw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: svn commit: r1139837 -
 /commons/proper/math/trunk/src/test/java/org/apache/commons/math/analysis/solvers/
From: sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com>
To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 27 June 2011 22:31, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 27 June 2011 11:13, Gilles Sadowski <gilles@harfang.homelinux.org> wro=
te:
>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 12:16:05AM +0100, sebb wrote:
>>> On 26 June 2011 18:02, =A0<erans@apache.org> wrote:
>>> > Author: erans
>>> > Date: Sun Jun 26 17:02:20 2011
>>> > New Revision: 1139837
>>> >
>>> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=3D1139837&view=3Drev
>>> > Log:
>>> > MATH-599
>>> > Name change to avoid test failure on the automated build system ("gum=
p").
>>>
>>> Actually, the failure is nothing to do with Gump per se.
>>> The test fails with Ant, because JUnit does not like abstract files.
>>
>> This why the test failed. But the reason for the change was that two
>> standard tool suites ("maven" vs "gump") did not provide the same result=
.
>> Of course I didn't mean that there was a bug in "gump", but that gump
>> reported failure while maven did not.
>
> You might as well say that Continuum did not report failure, but Gump did=
.
>
> Gump can use either Ant or Maven, so the message is misleading.

Also, the fix works for stand-alone Ant, which is more to the point.

>
>>
>> Gilles
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org