Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EF1D76FC1 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 16:30:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 86596 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 16:30:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 86442 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 16:30:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 86433 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jun 2011 16:30:43 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 16:30:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of maurizio.cucchiara@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.179 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.179] (HELO mail-px0-f179.google.com) (209.85.212.179) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 16:30:35 +0000 Received: by pxi2 with SMTP id 2so3396876pxi.38 for ; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 09:30:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=7BWKi8C5FvYeqSo8PUPxkWLblRuw84QOEELq8bzwatk=; b=q/VSWGxYVInKeofCetTqfsZYmulWvqGqom6besZ/2ML7lPI7OUCy67iLOW6I9eTnWA Rxspgz95EZvCNmiQYPEFBaXiq/Cep9nFiUhuUAHbULFFmNOpwFfSFjwSA3E2mURMxZz1 tNJJ2j8ADDfPdREYjzzdL3+mGLepNzTHviCYY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=TsK/ckkmDDT3hLNpYDOSUPv56HOTmsqMhC98dxe0SPWsy9AxJLURikmrM17pcabMkf 5XYi7UhIh8+8/QMfC1f9jRA2G5Xb4VZPp59pX90ycMKOhXU7cJDpulP4jvD4Fvzy/eV2 H+APmAbeuWs/E95k7V6AvwD5HuuwU9AKcupXA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.143.153.13 with SMTP id f13mr71948wfo.380.1307464214126; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 09:30:14 -0700 (PDT) Sender: maurizio.cucchiara@gmail.com Received: by 10.142.166.3 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 09:30:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1307436190644-3578976.post@n4.nabble.com> References: <9D9F56E612A64E35A9C03815FEF6A235@reclaimed> <1307436190644-3578976.post@n4.nabble.com> Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 18:30:14 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: iCgqULp-UODcTl5nUmPrTLlCLmA Message-ID: Subject: Re: [ognl] internal cache performance improvement From: Maurizio Cucchiara To: Commons Developers List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, guys. I set-up the shade plugin inside the OGNL pom [1], which allows us to do some performance test on S2. WDYT? [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OGNL-16 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org