Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" <dev@commons.apache.org>
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: jcarman@carmanconsulting.com
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=8t0_2JEEdVWgfK4W5E3Q1zN=veQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <31919367.33431295348144951.JavaMail.jira@thor>
 <103736157.1710.1307488140271.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org>
 <BANLkTi=8t0_2JEEdVWgfK4W5E3Q1zN=veQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: James Carman <james@carmanconsulting.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 11:07:30 -0400
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=9qCagKtg0H5xYMwyujStZq5wDXQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [IP clearance] Fwd: [jira] [Commented] (JXPATH-149) Relational
 operation misbehaves
To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org>, gudnabrsam@gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Perhaps you can re-write this patch yourself in a clean-room environment? :=
)

On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Matt Benson <gudnabrsam@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
> =A0I haven't waited long, but it is possible the user who submitted the
> patch for this bug may not respond, and in this case his patch
> consists only of a minor tweak to a copy of a method from the same
> class, so I think requiring the feather on the JIRA patch is a bit of
> overkill in this case. =A0Is there a "threshold of originality" below
> which we can simply assume clearance?
>
> Matt
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Matt Benson (JIRA) <jira@apache.org>
> Date: Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 6:09 PM
> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (JXPATH-149) Relational operation misbehaves
> To: issues@commons.apache.org
>
>
>
> =A0 =A0[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JXPATH-149?page=3Dcom.atla=
ssian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=
=3D13045698#comment-13045698
> ]
>
> Matt Benson commented on JXPATH-149:
> ------------------------------------
>
> Hi, I have reviewed your proposed fix and it looks good. =A0For
> formality's sake, can you please declare that your changes are
> intended for inclusion into the Apache Commons JXPath library?
>
> Also, in the future, please provide your changes in the form of diff patc=
hes.
>
> Thanks!
>
>> Relational operation misbehaves
>> -------------------------------
>>
>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Key: JXPATH-149
>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/brow=
se/JXPATH-149
>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Project: Commons JXPath
>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Issue Type: Bug
>> =A0 =A0Affects Versions: 1.3
>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Reporter: Alexander Koledzhikov
>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Priority: Minor
>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Attachments: CoreOperationRelationalExpression.java, Tes=
tClass.java
>>
>>
>> I have a simple JXpathContext, with the following variables: var1=3D0, v=
ar2=3D0, var3=3D1. When I try to evaluate the following expression - "$var1=
 + $var2 <=3D $var3", it returns false.
>
> --
> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org