Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8DB3D4230 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 17:52:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 32086 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2011 17:52:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 31976 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2011 17:52:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 31968 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jun 2011 17:52:49 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 17:52:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of phil.steitz@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.51 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.51] (HELO mail-pz0-f51.google.com) (209.85.210.51) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 17:52:42 +0000 Received: by pzk26 with SMTP id 26so1195749pzk.38 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 10:52:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=yYmrxtQlx8t23+J9uUMZ3Yg4IGoPPfqAfRJKhbgKCjs=; b=V3dHnI7bCJF0wFUbg1JLP8lymC/ItKxSj6Mw8fxD7F4eKDKnWd92v9evB+gaLU2Uuv ksLcjpbV6u6QegjM9lztsEV/yWDUu1YqQonpB+AWpaSkcb88RXY6pB4K9B5VUHEnA/z5 m+5G0mfEd1t5M/FiAazawbdWi18ZxNYbm9vAU= Received: by 10.68.1.34 with SMTP id 2mr1581820pbj.495.1309369941239; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 10:52:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from a.local (71-223-70-131.phnx.qwest.net [71.223.70.131]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x1sm1069099pbb.2.2011.06.29.10.52.20 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 29 Jun 2011 10:52:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E0B6652.5080208@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 10:52:18 -0700 From: Phil Steitz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 Thunderbird/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Digester 3.0 based on RC1 - take2 References: <1309290918.v2.mailanyonewebmail-596227@fuseweb2e> <4E0B577C.6070805@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 6/29/11 10:44 AM, Matt Benson wrote: > On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 11:49 AM, Phil Steitz wrote: >> On 6/29/11 8:58 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote: >>> Hi all guys, >>> I just realized that the tag[1] dir name is in the wrong pattern - I >>> overlooked the fact that the release:plugin tagged with the default >>> one :( >>> Now the question is: is it fine just moving it with a 'svn move' or >>> the RC has to be rebuilt from scratch? >>> Many thanks in advance, have a nice day! >> As long as the contents of the tag correspond to what is in the RC, >> you are OK. The important thing is that the tag name should include >> "RC" in it so it is not mistaken for a final release tag, which >> should be created after the VOTE succeeds. > *Created*, or renamed? Well, it does not exist before you do the cp or mv to "create" it, so I would say it is "created" on release :) But you are right, what we now always do is copy or rename the lucky winning RC tag. Personally, I like leaving the last RC tag there (i.e. cp vs mv) because the VOTE thread and other emails may refer to it. Phil > Matt > >> Phil >>> Simo >>> >>> [1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/digester/tags/commons-digester3-3.0/ >>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >>> http://www.99soft.org/ >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 11:14 PM, Simone Tripodi >>> wrote: >>>> Hi Dave, >>>> very nice to meet you and thanks for reporting! >>>> That should be non blocking, once the 3.0 release passed, the >>>> 3.1-SNAPSHOT site will be re-deployed and will override wrong >>>> link/deprecated and already fixed references! >>>> Have a nice day! >>>> Simo >>>> >>>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >>>> http://www.99soft.org/ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 9:55 PM, Dave Brosius wrote: >>>>> Perhaps i am confused but it appears the source code links on the web site (http://commons.apache.org/digester/source-repository.html) are wrong,http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/sandbox/digester3/trunk >>>>> svn checkout http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/sandbox/digester3/trunk commons-digester3 Is this the right one -- it seems to worksvn checkout http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/digester/trunk commons-digesterCould someone fix them, (or me, which ever is wrong?)dave ----- Original Message -----From: "Simone Tripodi" >;simonetripodi@apache.org >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org >>> >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org