commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Simone Tripodi <simonetrip...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE][Digester] Accept the Digester3 on Sandbox as new Digester
Date Thu, 09 Jun 2011 21:04:58 GMT
Hi Jochen!!!
thanks for your interest, I can reply to all of your questions: new
Digester APIs have been created branching the old ones, polishing
them, removed @Deprecated methods, and rewritten Annotations/XMLRules
internals, in order to be a natural extension of the new Rules binder.
SO:

> Is the new branch expected
> to be binary upwards compatible or not?

not totally - basic Digester APIs have been preserved, but extensions
are totally different, even if they process same inputs - that's why I
opted for changing java package name (org.apache.commons.digester3)
and Maven groupId (org.apache.commons) and artifactId
(commons-digester3)

> If it is: Is there a clirr report or something similar?

I produced a clirr report[1] included in the site on sandbox,
repackaging new code to old package (via the jarjar-plugin, in a
separate dir) and compared with commons-digester:commons-digester:2.1
to have a whole vision about what has changed

> If it is not: Does it change Java package name and Maven groupId
> and/or artifactId?

yes :P
Thanks to you, have a nice day!!!
Simo

[1] http://commons.apache.org/sandbox/digester3/clirr-report.html

http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/



On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 10:47 PM, Jochen Wiedmann
<jochen.wiedmann@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am asking because of a recent case in ws: Is the new branch expected
> to be binary upwards compatible or not?
>
> If it is: Is there a clirr report or something similar?
>
> If it is not: Does it change Java package name and Maven groupId
> and/or artifactId?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jochen
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 10:42 PM, Simone Tripodi
> <simonetripodi@apache.org> wrote:
>> Hi all guys,
>> After some month of hard work on Digester3 on Sandbox[1] (and a
>> failing attempt), I'm here to open a vote to accept the new Digester
>> APIs be moved on proper /trunk.
>> The idea is to move the current /trunk in a DIGESTER_2_X branch, then
>> move the Sandbox on current proper /trunk
>>
>> The vote will be open for the next 72 hours and will be closed on July
>> 12th, at 9:00pm
>> Please cast your votes, many thanks in advance!!
>> All the best, have a nice day!
>> Simo
>>
>> [ ] +1, accept the Digester3 on Sandbox as the codebase for the new Digester
>> [ ] +/- 0
>> [ ] -1, because (provide a reason why)
>>
>> [1] http://commons.apache.org/sandbox/digester3/
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>> http://www.99soft.org/
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Capitalism is the astounding belief that the most wickedest of men
> will do the most wickedest of things for the greatest good of
> everyone.
>
> John Maynard Keynes (http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Keynes)
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message