commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Simone Tripodi <simonetrip...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DIGESTER][SANDBOX] back proposing the Digester3 merge to trunk
Date Wed, 01 Jun 2011 05:46:02 GMT
Hi Rahul :)
thanks for following up!

I can confirm they're NOT binary compatible even without running
clirr, because of the following reasons:

 - deprecated APIs don't exist anymore;
 - internals of annotations/xml modules have been rewritten as EDSL extensions;
 - some Digester methods changed signature, like Digester.pushParams(
Object object ) versus the new Digester.pushParams( Object... object )
 - due to all these changes, I took advantage to repackage classes to
org.apache.commons.digester3

Anyway I didn't break the pure Digester use as I did in the previous
attempt, users are still able to bin rules using the usual pattern

    Digester d = new Digester();
    d.addObjectCreate("foo", "mypackage.Foo");
    ...

I would really appreciate if you have spare time to have a look at the
code, I immagine you are quiet busy but there's no rush ;)
Have a nice day, all the best!!!
Simo

http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/



On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 12:08 AM, Rahul Akolkar <rahul.akolkar@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 5:46 PM, Simone Tripodi
> <simonetripodi@apache.org> wrote:
>> New site is online, does someone have some spare time to check[1] and
>> provide feedbacks about the merge proposal?
> <snip/>
>
> Don't have much time, but if its now compatible with 2.x thats a good
> thing :-) You may want to confirm using a clirr or equivalent report.
>
> -Rahul
>
>
>> Thanks in advance, have a nice day!!!
>> Simo
>>
>> [1] http://commons.apache.org/sandbox/digester3/
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>> http://www.99soft.org/
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 6:41 PM, Simone Tripodi
>> <simonetripodi@apache.org> wrote:
>>> Hi all guys,
>>> after some day of work on Sandbox, I'm back to propose once again the
>>> merge of my work in proper /trunk.
>>> Failing my first attempt was good, because I had the opportunity to
>>> learn a lot and this time the proposal is much better :P
>>>
>>> What I did:
>>>
>>>  - moved the current sandbox in a separate branch;
>>>  - copied the current trunk in sandbox;
>>>  - polished APIs (few trivial checkstyle violations yet), removed
>>> @Deprecated methods, added more power with generics;
>>>  - re-introduced - simplifying! - the Digester EDSL;
>>>  - removed old custom DigesterLoader for annotations/xml package.
>>>
>>> So, at the end of the day, this time users are still able to create
>>> Digester instances using the old-fashioned APIs - even if they're
>>> encouraged to use the more expressive fluent APIs - except when using
>>> annotations/XML extensions.
>>>
>>> I still have to publish the site - it's the site on /trunk + EDSL
>>> documentation - I'll do it as soon as I'll get home (I'm leaving the
>>> office now) so you can see how APIs/Doc look
>>>
>>> Anyway interested people can start having a look at the component code on SVN[1]
>>>
>>> Please send huge feedbacks!!!
>>> Have a nice day!
>>> Simo
>>>
>>> [1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/sandbox/digester3/trunk
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>>> http://www.99soft.org/
>>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message