commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Matt Benson <gudnabr...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [lang] Time for RC3?
Date Sat, 18 Jun 2011 03:17:04 GMT
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 9:00 PM, Henri Yandell <flamefew@gmail.com> wrote:
> We had an RC3 vote so shouldn't remove; but I'm very happy if you've
> time to do an RC4. I've been managing about enough time to look at the
> outstanding issues before I'm back to the diapers.
>

That's why I asked... I couldn't find the evidence of the RC3 vote for
some reason, but I'll take your word for it.

> Which is 'what's in JIRA' plus the discussion on the text.translate/Range API.

JIRA seems clear, no?  Do we need to wait on the other issue, then?

Matt

>
> Hen
>
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Matt Benson <gudnabrsam@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hen,
>>  Despite my pathological fear of the RM role, especially in
>> conjunction with Maven, I am contemplating picking this up since my
>> kids are so much older than yours.  Do you have any objection to my
>> removing your RC3 svn tag?
>>
>> br,
>> Matt
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 12:56 AM, Henri Yandell <flamefew@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 9:58 PM, Henri Yandell <flamefew@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 11:36 PM, Henri Yandell <flamefew@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>> These are the current blocking items in play afaik:
>>>>>
>>>>> * Email thread - what else should implement Formattable?
>>>>
>>>> Sounds like this is now:
>>>>
>>>> * Update javadoc for Mutable classes to indicate that they can't do
>>>> much to make them useful in String.format.
>>>>
>>>> We could consider making Fraction, StopWatch and others use Format
>>>> under the hood and thus implementing Formattable, but I'm not sure I
>>>> see much point. I also don't see adding Formattable later on as a
>>>> backwards compat issue, but maybe I'm being dim (flu + newborn,
>>>> verrrrry dim right now).
>>>
>>> Note, I don't consider either of these to be required for 3.0. I've
>>> documented the javadoc as LANG-698 and the consideration of adding
>>> Formattable as LANG-699.
>>>
>>>>> * LANG-696/Email thread - getShortName. What to do with the (String)
>>>>> variant. Remove others.
>>>>
>>>> I've updated LANG-696. I think we need to decide which of the following we
want:
>>>>
>>>> getSimpleName(Map.Entry.class) => "Entry"  [Matches JVM]
>>>> getSimpleName(Map.Entry.class) => "Map.Entry" [Matches Lang 2.x]
>>>
>>> I think we should think more on this (i.e. post 3.0) and it's not the
>>> end of the world to be stuck with getSimpleName until 4.0.
>>>
>>> Hen
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message