Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6DE9B4A56 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 19:01:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 72601 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 19:01:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 72518 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 19:01:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 72510 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2011 19:01:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 19:01:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of antonio.petrelli@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.43 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.43] (HELO mail-qw0-f43.google.com) (209.85.216.43) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 19:01:14 +0000 Received: by qwf6 with SMTP id 6so554489qwf.30 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 12:00:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=mb/dyS5ORClGw0Ppmvz7aJ3HRHpWl7JepKDrv16MOd8=; b=c34KJCu0+AxlnwKGMlksdS5qTHifz44vsNCyM5Ovq9Rhq3/VJaAUPN3GkCo5kiIKhv D5TVPEOJ8OfGDVuPQ+xyJfP+m3ymSFQYIEQzuWjtDWIj+YUPvm0U+DxzxW3qXzV8o8Gz o3hd9kL+aTdqDzxWykzeGHugBerI/aHjBHCbU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=gdOJtaQCbcgnRhMp74qi1rJMNQCN2vH9sMQK7ZIGdQRA686WGptAbRkYj69DYh9chf c1dXcL/k4eqh7tf9JzjgOxhDEMzwBkqrGLZaBBcC0pbkk78bGGg0FSN4DIS2ckTcOfUz fQpZE6U+juS/jXTWoR/mHu3x15DpqZ/+zEapI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.53.79 with SMTP id l15mr763709qcg.83.1305658853850; Tue, 17 May 2011 12:00:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.69.23 with HTTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 12:00:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 21:00:53 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [OGNL] drop old opensymphony build From: Antonio Petrelli To: Commons Developers List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015175ca84e2e7ea004a37d642c X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0015175ca84e2e7ea004a37d642c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 2011/5/17 Simone Tripodi > WDYT on dropping old opensymphony ant related build stuff? I think > maintaining the maven stuff only is more than enough, or not? > I don't think that minor-task worths an Iusse, just discuss about it here. > Hi Absolutely, kill Ant stuff, we don't need it and we can do anything with Maven plugins. Antonio P.S. Been out for 4 days so sorry for not having read it before. --0015175ca84e2e7ea004a37d642c--