Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" <dev@commons.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of simone.tripodi@gmail.com
 designates 74.125.82.171 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        b=k8L0NXr+zhhdPdGXq8mfyzW3bXU41licFkEmDZ6LcyStxvjlQM0nDaPqtc9XXMmkca
         ovsOWihPc3ZgRUeKaHC570FsUmvXofwjKbRvOsIx+UfvirfGTyPGyoUDUSdW6T/xRJnF
         vSa/bHbVaPQ12TJxhyUPjtYC1/FiBFuGEHWLA=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: simone.tripodi@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <4DC3C814.70309@apache.org>
References: <BANLkTin5QL4Jmxi60uraLRWHz-yYCvtzLQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTi=r+jQdukneHthjUhNW3irxqSR7AA@mail.gmail.com>
	<4DC2D13F.4060509@gmail.com>
	<4DC2D390.40201@apache.org>
	<4DC2DCA3.2000603@gmail.com>
	<4DC2DE0A.5010701@apache.org>
	<4DC2E799.9050500@gmail.com>
	<4DC3C814.70309@apache.org>
Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 12:32:28 +0200
Message-ID: <BANLkTinNXQJGJkzVafC2HMaSq_2TZ1UziA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [POOL2][PROPOSAL] releasing commons-pool2-2.0-beta1
From: Simone Tripodi <simonetripodi@apache.org>
To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Hi Mark,
I'm not j.u.c guru but if you're pleased to share your thoughts, I
would be glad to provide at least feedbacks.
Looking forward to see j.u.c. in action in pool, thanks for taking care of it!
Have a nice day,
Simo

http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/


On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Mark Thomas <markt@apache.org> wrote:
> On 05/05/2011 19:08, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> Re performance, don't forget to add something that skips the synch
>> in createDataSource - i.e., use a PoolingDataSource directly to
>> avoid the thread lineup on getConnection due to that internal synch.
>
> Just tested that locally. It doesn't help that much. The bottleneck is
> in the pooling allocate() code. I going to start looking at that today.
> Not sure how long it is going to take for me to replace it with
> something based on java.util.concurrent
>
> Mark
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org