commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Matt Benson <gudnabr...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [math] [sandbox] merging Apache Commons BSP into Apache Commons Math
Date Mon, 16 May 2011 14:19:57 GMT
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 6:01 PM, Phil Steitz <phil.steitz@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 5/15/11 9:43 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>> Le 15/05/2011 10:30, Mikkel Meyer Andersen a écrit :
>>> +1
>>>> From me, too.
>>
>> OK, it's done now. I have put everything as subpackages of
>> geometry as suggested by Phil, and I have taken care to use the
>> proper new exceptions as suggested by Gilles.
>>
>> I could simply remove the bsp directory from sandbox now, but I
>> think it is a little more complicated, as we need to remove the
>> component from various lists (in the sandbox page, in Jira ...).
>> Whate is the proper procedure for this ?
> There is no expectation that sandbox components will stay around.
> Just svn rm it and edit the site (commons-site) to get rid of it.
> IIRC, we don't have separate JIRA projects for sandbox components,
> so there is nothing needed there.
>

You would also want to edit the svn:externals property that points to
bsp/trunk from trunks-sandbox .

Matt

> Phil
>>
>> Luc
>>
>>> Den 14/05/2011 11.08 skrev "Luc Maisonobe"<Luc.Maisonobe@free.fr>:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> Some weeks ago, I have imported in the sandbox a new component,
>>>> Apache
>>>> Commons BSP which implements Binary Partitioning Trees (see the
>>>> thread
>>>> about this creation
>>>> here:<http://markmail.org/thread/mcg23trgtl472ica>).
>>>>
>>>> Thinking further about it, I would like to directly merge it into
>>>> [math]. We are creating a new major release for [math], so it
>>>> may be a
>>>> good time to do so. Also as I changed the code to put it in
>>>> sandbox, in
>>>> fact I already did all the necessary work to have a working
>>>> implementation, with tests and clean reports from checkstyle and
>>>> findbugs. The implementation is complete for dimensions 1, 2 and
>>>> 3 in
>>>> Cartesian space. I also need an implementation on spherical
>>>> geometry but
>>>> I can do that regardless of the component hosting this package.
>>>> So the
>>>> component could be promoted and it really makes sense to have it
>>>> inside
>>>> [math].
>>>>
>>>> It could be put as a bsp package at top level (alongside with
>>>> geometry,
>>>> analysis, ode ...).
>>>>
>>>> Does this suggestion makes sense ?
>>>> Luc
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message