commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Simone Tripodi <simonetrip...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DBCP2][Proposal] Drop JOCL support
Date Thu, 05 May 2011 20:13:12 GMT
+1

I wonder if any developer has the need to use JOCL today, given the
configuration super-power provided by modern IoC containers/DI
frameworks

http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/



On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 8:58 PM, Phil Steitz <phil.steitz@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 5/5/11 10:26 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>> Le 05/05/2011 19:09, Mark Thomas a écrit :
>>> I couldn't find much evidence (via Google) of JOCL being in
>>> current or
>>> recent usage therefore I'd like to drop it from DBCP 2.0.0 onwards.
>>>
>>> Any objections?
>>
>> Never heard of JOCL, is this the xml serialization format that was
>> introduced in Java 1.4 (with java.beans.XMLEncoder/Decoder) ?
>>
>> I don't think DBCP should be tied to a serialization format, so +1
>> for removing this part in DBCP 2.
>
> It is really a configuration specification language.  See
> *http://s.apache.org/vT.
>
> Phil
> *
>>
>> Emmanuel Bourg
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message