commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Phil Steitz <phil.ste...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Revised dormancy policy
Date Mon, 16 May 2011 22:11:39 GMT
On 5/16/11 2:57 PM, Paul Libbrecht wrote:
> So we should relaunch a vote?
> (or... I should vote a no and relaunch?)

Lets see how others respond.  There may be other changes...

Phil
> paul
>
>
> Le 16 mai 2011 à 23:44, Phil Steitz a écrit :
>
>>>>   d) svn remains open (but no commits without revival vote)
>>> It seems slightly too harsh to me.
>>> Since jelly is among the heaviest targeted ones here, I think the whole dormancy
aspect would fit but preventing commits sounds like the best way to "cap off any attempt of
revival".
>>> Couldn't we say
>>>
>> Good point.  I would be OK with that change.
>>
>> Phil
>>>>   d) svn remains open (but no release without revival vote)
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message