commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Paul Libbrecht <>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Revised dormancy policy
Date Mon, 16 May 2011 21:57:59 GMT
So we should relaunch a vote?
(or... I should vote a no and relaunch?)


Le 16 mai 2011 à 23:44, Phil Steitz a écrit :

>>>   d) svn remains open (but no commits without revival vote)
>> It seems slightly too harsh to me.
>> Since jelly is among the heaviest targeted ones here, I think the whole dormancy
aspect would fit but preventing commits sounds like the best way to "cap off any attempt of
>> Couldn't we say
> Good point.  I would be OK with that change.
> Phil
>>>   d) svn remains open (but no release without revival vote)

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message