Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9629D19B7 for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 13:52:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 3644 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2011 06:40:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 3442 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2011 06:40:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 3432 invoked by uid 99); 19 Apr 2011 06:40:32 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 06:40:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ralph.goers@dslextreme.com designates 209.85.160.43 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.43] (HELO mail-pw0-f43.google.com) (209.85.160.43) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 06:40:23 +0000 Received: by pwj4 with SMTP id 4so2769110pwj.30 for ; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 23:40:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.49.104 with SMTP id t8mr564517pbn.69.1303195201917; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 23:40:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.10.132] (cpe-75-82-178-177.socal.res.rr.com [75.82.178.177]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 5sm2787389pbt.12.2011.04.18.23.39.59 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 18 Apr 2011 23:40:00 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Subject: Re: [ALL] use lazy consensus voting for Commons Parent releases in future From: Ralph Goers In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 23:39:58 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: To: "Commons Developers List" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 Although it is technically a release, I can't imagine why any = external entity would directly use it. Even if they do they would have = to test it no matter what we do. Having a less formal procedure for this = just makes sense to me. Ralph On Apr 18, 2011, at 2:40 PM, sebb wrote: > As suggested by Hen, we should be able to use lazy consensus voting > for Commons Parent pom releases. >=20 > [ ] +1 let's use lazy consensus voting for Commons Parent pom in = future > [ ] -1 why not? >=20 > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org >=20 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org