Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 25919 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2011 00:00:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Apr 2011 00:00:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 15191 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2011 00:00:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 15097 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2011 00:00:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 15089 invoked by uid 99); 12 Apr 2011 00:00:41 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 00:00:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of sebbaz@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.43 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.43] (HELO mail-vw0-f43.google.com) (209.85.212.43) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 00:00:33 +0000 Received: by vws10 with SMTP id 10so5461852vws.30 for ; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 17:00:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=RY9V2JDm7M4NN/dfeJM0kCKUZyg8OCdGgpi1mefXZdQ=; b=FB/GrlMdN3bR9qRcTmfizLpqJuuIo/fOSoqcljFZltHfHQuMOyLfb/27Bp5ap1hcSI AwAm68ZaiDpMTzbBLFzEObK3oLb4nu57NKGLtykGOE442YjEb8MkIy/ay59Qxct6zIsp jxFTTJnwmQm0IDy7XpaWoYMH50EYv3XB9u9qo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=wurKGMvDWsrphu+XHUWQPcx8tOwV9u4rcPNEm1B9ayTo5XHl+Cm2v2xFr04/yCz3wX 7vXo1fdwfDs5Pin531JS63NJ+FaUxXANds4cuhsYshUxWWFefZxhG+ZzqUUunuymAvyU 1tmhKZ8Pyqg2EVxOefQTGf4+aCEuKkgDRZeho= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.67.105 with SMTP id m9mr4720992vdt.126.1302566411795; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 17:00:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.95.210 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 17:00:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5112879589480970177@unknownmsgid> References: <8896146700384213601@unknownmsgid> <5112879589480970177@unknownmsgid> Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 01:00:11 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [NET] 3.0 release packaging From: sebb To: Commons Developers List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 9 April 2011 04:00, Gary Gregory wrote: > On Apr 8, 2011, at 21:51, sebb wrote: > >> On 9 April 2011 01:21, Gary Gregory wrote: >>> Can we add a test jar to the list please? The apache release profile >>> should take care of it but I want to mention it here explicitly. I assume you want the test binary and test sources released as Maven artifacts? What about the dist/ archives? Should the binary test jar be added to the bin archive? Or is a Maven release sufficient? I don't care either way. [The source archive already contains the test sources] >> >> Do you mean the "apache-release" profile in Commons Parent 21-SNAPSHOT? > > Yep > >> >> That has yet to be voted on or released. > > Oh, right. > >> >> Also, I just tried it, and the test source and binary jars don't have >> NOTICE or LICENSE files > > Ug, another detail to take care of. I'm sans pc until Monday. I'll > take a look next week unless someone else can take a look. The fix is simple: one just has to add with the same content as . > Gary > >> >>> Thank you, >>> Gary >>> >>> On Apr 8, 2011, at 18:27, sebb wrote: >>> >>>> I'd like to start a vote for releasing NET 3.0. >>>> [Note: it's binary-compatible, but not source-compatible with 2.x, and >>>> it has a lot of new functionality which is why it uses 3.0 rather than >>>> 2.3.] >>>> >>>> One issue that does not seem to have been resolved is the contents of >>>> the release artifacts. >>>> >>>> I'm currently proposing to generate: >>>> >>>> Maven >>>> ===== >>>> commons-net-3.0.jar - binary jar, excluding examples >>>> commons-net-3.0-sources.jar - sources for the above >>>> commons-net-3.0-javadoc.jar - javadoc for the above >>>> >>>> commons-net-ftp-3.0.jar - subset of binary jar for FTP use only (was >>>> in previous releases) >>>> >>>> Non-Maven >>>> ======== >>>> commons-net-3.0-bin.zip/tgz - main binary - which contains: >>>> - commons-net-3.0.jar >>>> - commons-net-3.0-sources.jar (for IDEs) >>>> - commons-net-examples-3.0.jar (for testing) >>>> - javadoc (not in jar) >>>> - sources of examples (not in jar) (for developers) >>>> >>>> As mentioned above, the examples are useful for client testing, so I >>>> would like to include compiled versions as well as the source. >>>> >>>> commons-net-3.0-src.zip/tgz - sources, which contains: >>>> - all of SVN sources apart from DOAP >>>> >>>> I hope that this is adequate for most use-cases; if not please explain. >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org >>>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org >>> >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org