From dev-return-125307-apmail-commons-dev-archive=commons.apache.org@commons.apache.org Tue Apr 05 20:14:53 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 38575 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2011 20:14:52 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Apr 2011 20:14:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 51313 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2011 20:14:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 51136 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2011 20:14:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 51123 invoked by uid 99); 5 Apr 2011 20:14:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 20:14:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of flamefew@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.49 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.49] (HELO mail-ww0-f49.google.com) (74.125.82.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 20:14:44 +0000 Received: by wwb39 with SMTP id 39so873490wwb.6 for ; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 13:14:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=9YqN2ztFcqKjAZRfWHo3dqD+evLIlN6X0CpYd0DX7A8=; b=ayKaN+G48fMy7wLQqaHctcLD6CxZBcMtv5CZpL1Xkw1qeqVUwmU7LXo1dOMgCE91Yn pfrktTqi4TrALAesbMalQuLXxXK/QUBBSWg7GwWJD9rB4vlynfyvbu8BEx/d2a0HTi3t pyXaU+MaCjJ9t/KjrJFPldWeiXGD5LQtPciKU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=uhani/J10DCBBmKt15dLuoTiER5XERq3haTubx6/uNyw2jO1pbbRxUVMT65DLKoZ4U ThvtZejsKJgLRGJVp9t0x0NMMPQVyRLorZ9cPsNoYQ3kyNlYcV8J8ubOW8+ouZtiRyUy zLzvXqVfu2j5d9odkqHdvFCNznvMvCUP9K/FI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.240.3 with SMTP id d3mr5691255wer.51.1302034463825; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 13:14:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.80.148 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Apr 2011 13:14:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4D9B7332.3060801@apache.org> References: <4D9B7332.3060801@apache.org> Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 13:14:23 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [ALL] @version tag :) From: Henri Yandell To: Commons Developers List Cc: Emmanuel Bourg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Le 05/04/2011 11:59, Simone Tripodi a =E9crit : >> >> Hi all guys! >> I think we all should agree on adopting a common policy, it shouldn't >> be dependent by who takes care of a component. >> I see different opinion about @version tag usage, so what's next? >> shall we calla =A0vote to make a definitive decision? >> I'm worried that this discussion could degenerate in a loooong thread :P >> Simo > > Well with this and the @author tags you've hit a nerve. Please wait a bit > before starting the next discussion about brace placement, indentation si= ze > or Git migration ;) I want to see what's next! I can't wait a bit, that's FOREVER! Hen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org