commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [lang] Pair vs. [collection] org.apache.commons.collections.keyvalue
Date Mon, 11 Apr 2011 19:57:54 GMT
Drop keyvalue in favour of Pair? :)

More seriously; keep Pair (or keyvalue if that's a better name) in
Lang, and make Collections depend on Lang for the core pair concept.

Hen

On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgregory@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All:
>
> I am now realize that what we are stumbling along with Pair has already been
> done in org.apache.commons.collections.keyvalue, generics and all. Different
> class names but the same ideas.
>
> So... it sure would be nice to avoid creating the same thing in [lang] but
> with different class names.
>
> What are our options:
> - Continue blindly
> - Converge both components on the same class names. [lang] has 3 classes,
> [collections] has 8.
> - Drop Pair in favor of org.apache.commons.collections.keyvalue.
>
> I feel we need a good story here before releasing 3.0 with 3 new Pair
> classes.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> --
> Thank you,
> Gary
>
> http://garygregory.wordpress.com/
> http://garygregory.com/
> http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/
> http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message